From: Daniel Veillard Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:31:37 +0000 Subject: Fix a couple of places where (f)printf parameters were broken As reported by Thomas Jarosch --- python/libxslt.c | 10 +++++----- xsltproc/xsltproc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/python/libxslt.c b/python/libxslt.c index 6a4f1c3..8dd6c78 100644 --- a/python/libxslt.c +++ b/python/libxslt.c @@ -356,15 +356,15 @@ libxslt_xsltRegisterExtModuleElement(PyObject *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, PyObject *pyobj_element_f; PyObject *pyobj_precomp_f; -#ifdef DEBUG_EXTENSIONS - printf("libxslt_xsltRegisterExtModuleElement called\n", - name, ns_uri); -#endif - if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, (char *)"szOO:registerExtModuleElement", &name, &ns_uri, &pyobj_precomp_f, &pyobj_element_f)) return(NULL); +#ifdef DEBUG_EXTENSIONS + printf("libxslt_xsltRegisterExtModuleElement called: %s %s\n", + name, ns_uri); +#endif + if ((name == NULL) || (pyobj_element_f == NULL) || (pyobj_precomp_f == NULL)) { py_retval = libxml_intWrap(-1); return(py_retval); diff --git a/xsltproc/xsltproc.c b/xsltproc/xsltproc.c index 9ec4b76..33beddf 100644 --- a/xsltproc/xsltproc.c +++ b/xsltproc/xsltproc.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static void endTimer(char *format, ...) va_start(ap, format); vfprintf(stderr,format,ap); va_end(ap); - fprintf(stderr, " was not timed\n", msec); + fprintf(stderr, " was not timed\n"); #else /* We don't have gettimeofday, time or stdarg.h, what crazy world is * this ?!